The Florida Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury — 2 Years After 2023
Florida's personal injury filing deadline dropped from four years to two on March 24, 2023, when Governor Ron DeSantis signed House Bill 837 into law. The amendment to Fla. Stat. §95.11(3)(a) took effect the same day it was signed, which means any accident occurring on or after March 24, 2023 falls under the tighter clock.
The transition rule is straightforward: injuries that occurred before March 24, 2023 retain the old four-year period. Injuries on or after that date get two years. The old deadline still applies in full to those injured before the signing date; the new two-year rule does not reach back.
The two-year window starts on the date of the accident or injury — not the date you realized how serious the injury was, not the date your medical treatment concluded, and not the date your insurer finished processing your claim. Florida courts are strict about this. A case filed one day late, with overwhelming evidence of serious injury, gets dismissed. The deadline is not a formality.
Critical deadline warning: If you were injured in Florida on or after March 24, 2023, you have two years to file suit — half the time Florida allowed before HB 837. Many Floridians still believe the old four-year limit applies. It does not. Missing this deadline permanently bars your claim, regardless of injury severity or clear fault.
There are additional pre-suit requirements if your claim involves a government entity. Claims against the State of Florida or its agencies require a written notice of claim sent to the agency at least three years before any lawsuit is filed — though the statute of limitations itself still controls the outer boundary. For city or county defendants, separate notice provisions under Fla. Stat. §768.28 apply. These notice requirements run on their own timeline and can effectively shorten the available window even further.
Special tolling rules exist for minors (the limitations period generally does not begin until the child turns 18) and for cases involving fraudulent concealment of facts. These exceptions are narrow. Relying on them is risky without legal counsel confirming they apply to the specific facts of your situation.
Florida's Negligence Rule: Modified Comparative Fault (51% Bar) — Changed in 2023
Before March 24, 2023, Florida used pure comparative negligence. Under that system, a plaintiff who was 90% at fault for their own injury could still recover 10% of their damages from the other party. It was the most plaintiff-permissive negligence standard in American tort law.
HB 837 ended that. Florida Statute §768.81(6) now states that any party found to be greater than 50 percent at fault for their own harm may not recover any damages. This is modified comparative negligence with a 51% bar — the standard used by the majority of U.S. states, but a sharp departure from what Florida injury victims had relied on for decades.
In practice, if a jury decides you were 51% or more responsible for the accident, you recover nothing. If you were 50% at fault or less, you can still recover, but your damages award is reduced by your share of fault. A plaintiff found 40% at fault on a $100,000 verdict walks away with $60,000.
What this means for slip-and-fall cases: Florida premises liability cases — slips, trips, falls in stores and parking lots — often involve disputed fault. Defendants now argue that a plaintiff's inattention makes them majority-responsible. Under pure comparative fault, that argument only reduced damages. Under the new rule, a finding of 51% plaintiff fault eliminates the claim entirely. This shift has made premises liability litigation significantly more defendant-friendly.
The statute carves out two important exceptions. First, medical negligence claims under Chapter 766 remain under the old pure comparative negligence system — the 51% bar does not apply to medical malpractice. Second, section 768.81 does not apply at all to intentional tort claims, meaning a plaintiff who is the victim of an assault or other deliberate wrong can still recover full damages regardless of any comparative fault assigned to them. The intentional tort carveout exists because it would be inequitable to apportion fault between a deliberate wrongdoer and an unwitting victim.
The practical impact of the negligence rule change fell hardest on plaintiffs in cases with contested liability — precisely the cases where defendants are most inclined to fight. Insurance adjusters and defense attorneys now have a powerful tool to argue that an injured person bears majority responsibility, converting a recoverable claim into a zero-recovery outcome.
Medical Malpractice Caps in Florida: Struck Down
Florida's legislature enacted non-economic damage caps for medical malpractice cases under Fla. Stat. §766.118. The statute placed ceilings on pain and suffering and similar non-economic awards in malpractice suits, with different limits depending on whether the defendant was a practitioner or a non-practitioner, and whether the case involved wrongful death.
The Florida Supreme Court has ruled these caps unconstitutional twice. In Estate of McCall v. United States (2014), the court struck down the caps as applied to wrongful death medical malpractice cases, finding that they violated the equal protection guarantee of the Florida Constitution by placing an arbitrary ceiling on the damages of the most severely harmed victims. The court concluded that the caps "arbitrarily reduce damages for a class of plaintiffs who are, by definition, most grievously injured."
Three years later, in North Broward Hospital District v. Kalitan (2017), the Supreme Court applied the same reasoning to non-death medical malpractice cases and struck those caps down as well. The practical result: Fla. Stat. §766.118 remains on the books in its statutory text, but it is unenforceable. A Florida jury's non-economic damages award in a medical malpractice case is not subject to any statutory cap.
HB 837 changed many aspects of Florida tort law but did not revive or reinstate the med mal caps. Medical negligence claims also retained pure comparative negligence rather than being subject to the new 51% bar — the legislature explicitly kept malpractice cases outside the HB 837 framework on both points.
For non-malpractice personal injury cases, Florida does not impose caps on compensatory non-economic damages. Punitive damages are governed by Fla. Stat. §768.73, which generally limits punitive awards to three times compensatory damages or $500,000, whichever is greater — with a higher cap available when the defendant acted with specific intent to harm. Punitive damages require clear and convincing evidence of intentional misconduct or gross negligence, and a court must allow a separate discovery phase and pretrial hearing before they can be pursued.
Florida's No-Fault PIP Auto Insurance System
Florida is one of a shrinking number of no-fault states. Under Fla. Stat. §627.736, every registered vehicle owner in Florida must carry at least $10,000 in Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage. After an accident, your own PIP insurer pays benefits — not the at-fault driver's insurer — covering 80% of necessary and reasonable medical expenses and 60% of lost wages up to the $10,000 policy limit, regardless of who caused the crash.
PIP is fast by design. The trade-off is that it does not cover pain and suffering. To recover non-economic damages from the at-fault driver, you must step outside the no-fault system — and Florida law requires you to qualify first.
The serious injury threshold: Under Fla. Stat. §627.737, you cannot sue an at-fault Florida driver for pain and suffering unless your injury qualifies as: a significant and permanent loss of an important bodily function, a permanent injury within a reasonable degree of medical probability, significant and permanent scarring or disfigurement, or death. Temporary injuries — even severe ones — do not meet this standard. A physician must be able to testify, within a reasonable degree of medical probability, that the condition is permanent.
The $10,000 PIP limit runs out quickly in serious accidents. Once it is exhausted, the injured person turns to their own health insurance, Medical Payments (MedPay) coverage if they purchased it, or a third-party liability claim against the at-fault driver's bodily injury coverage. Florida does not require drivers to carry bodily injury liability insurance — only PIP and $10,000 in property damage liability are mandatory — which makes uninsured motorist (UM) coverage particularly valuable here.
One procedural requirement catches many accident victims off guard: PIP coverage is forfeited if the injured person does not seek medical treatment within 14 days of the accident. There is a narrow exception for emergency medical conditions, but the general rule is firm. Waiting to see if you feel better is not worth the risk of losing PIP benefits entirely.
Optional PIP supplements exist. Some policies offer combined PIP and MedPay coverage, while others allow stacking of UM coverage across multiple vehicles on the same policy. Given Florida's persistently high rate of uninsured drivers, these optional coverages are worth understanding before an accident, not after one.
Estimate Your Florida Settlement Value
Use our free calculator to see what your Florida personal injury case may be worth — including PIP interactions.
Use the Free Calculator →