The Arkansas Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury
Arkansas gives injury victims three years to file a personal injury lawsuit. That deadline comes from Ark. Code Ann. §16-56-105(3), which sets a three-year limitation period for personal injury actions. Three years is longer than many states — California, Texas, and a number of others allow only two — giving Arkansans relatively more time to stabilize medically before committing to litigation.
The clock typically starts on the date of the injury. For car accidents in Little Rock or slip-and-falls in Fayetteville, that means the day the harm occurred. Arkansas also recognizes a discovery rule in limited circumstances: if an injury was not reasonably discoverable at the time it happened, the limitations period may begin when the plaintiff discovered or reasonably should have discovered the harm. This arises most often in toxic exposure cases and certain latent medical injury situations.
Several exceptions can toll the statute. Minors do not begin running the clock until they turn 18, at which point the standard three-year period applies from that date. Mental incapacity can also pause the limitations period. Fraud by a defendant that conceals the injury or its cause may similarly delay the start of the clock under Arkansas case law.
Government defendants require special attention. Claims against Arkansas state agencies or municipalities are subject to the Arkansas Tort Claims Act, which requires written notice of the claim within one year of the injury. That one-year notice window is far shorter than the standard limitations period, and missing it can be fatal to a case even if the three-year filing deadline has not yet passed. Anyone injured on government property or by a government employee should consult a licensed Arkansas attorney without delay.
Filing deadline warning: Arkansas's three-year window is longer than most states, but courts enforce it strictly. A lawsuit filed one day late is dismissed with no exceptions for nearly-ready claims or good-faith mistakes. If you have a potential claim in Arkansas, treat the three-year mark as a hard deadline and build your timeline around it, not toward it.
Arkansas's Negligence Rule: Modified Comparative Fault (50% Bar)
Arkansas uses modified comparative fault, codified at Ark. Code Ann. §16-64-122. The rule is straightforward in structure: liability is determined by comparing the fault attributable to each party. If the plaintiff bears less than 50% of the total fault, they can recover damages, reduced proportionally by their own percentage. A plaintiff found 30% at fault for a crash recovers 70% of the total damages awarded.
The 50% threshold is the dividing line. If a plaintiff's fault equals or exceeds the fault of the defendant, the plaintiff cannot recover anything. This is the "50% bar." It applies to the comparison of the plaintiff's fault against the aggregate fault of all defendants from whom they seek to recover.
The practical result at exactly 50% is a complete bar. At 49%, recovery is permitted (at a 49% reduction). At 50%, recovery is zero. This makes the precise allocation of fault in disputed liability cases critically important, particularly in trials before Pulaski County Circuit Court or the Western District of Arkansas federal courts, where multi-defendant accidents frequently produce complex fault apportionment disputes.
The statute defines "fault" broadly to include any act, omission, conduct, assumed risk, breach of warranty, or breach of any legal duty that is a proximate cause of the damages at issue. Arkansas has abolished joint and several liability in cases governed by the comparative fault statute. Each defendant pays only their proportionate share of fault. A defendant found 20% responsible pays 20% of the damages, not the full amount. This matters significantly when one defendant is judgment-proof or uninsured.
Insurance adjusters know the 50% threshold and may attempt to push a plaintiff's assigned fault above it during claims negotiations. Any disputed liability claim in Arkansas benefits from legal representation before recorded statements are given or liability positions are formally adopted.
Damage Caps in Arkansas Personal Injury Cases
Arkansas does not impose statutory caps on compensatory damages in general personal injury cases. Arkansas courts have historically interpreted the state constitution as constraining the legislature's authority to cap jury awards in civil cases, and the state remains among the more plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions in this respect.
Economic damages — medical bills, lost wages, future medical expenses, and diminished earning capacity — are fully recoverable without a ceiling. Non-economic damages, which include pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and disfigurement, are also uncapped under current Arkansas law.
Medical malpractice cases follow the same general framework. Arkansas does not currently impose a statutory cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice actions, unlike states such as California or Texas that have specific med mal ceilings. The Arkansas Medical Malpractice Act (Ark. Code Ann. §16-114-201 et seq.) governs procedure and proof standards for malpractice claims but does not set a ceiling on compensatory awards.
Punitive damages are available in Arkansas when the defendant's conduct was malicious, willful, wanton, or in reckless disregard of the plaintiff's rights. Arkansas courts can reduce punitive awards that are grossly excessive relative to compensatory damages under constitutional due process principles, but there is no fixed statutory multiplier or cap on punitives under Arkansas law.
Legislative efforts to limit damage awards in Arkansas have appeared periodically. The current no-cap status reflects constitutional constraints and court decisions as of June 2026, but this is an area that can change. Confirm the current state of any applicable limits with a licensed Arkansas attorney before relying on this information in an active case.
Auto Insurance and Personal Injury Claims in Arkansas
Arkansas operates under a traditional tort (at-fault) system for auto insurance. The driver who caused an accident is financially responsible for the resulting injuries and property damage. Injured parties file claims against the at-fault driver's liability insurance, which is the defining feature of the tort system versus no-fault states like Michigan or Florida, where each party turns first to their own insurer.
Arkansas law sets minimum liability coverage at $25,000 per person for bodily injury, $50,000 per accident for bodily injury when multiple people are hurt, and $25,000 for property damage — commonly written as 25/50/25. These minimums have not kept pace with modern medical costs. A single night in a Little Rock or Fayetteville hospital can consume the entire $25,000 per-person limit before surgery, rehabilitation, or follow-up care is counted.
Arkansas also requires uninsured motorist (UM) coverage at the same minimum levels as liability insurance. Drivers may waive UM coverage in writing, but without it, a collision with an uninsured driver leaves the injured party with sharply fewer options. Underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage — which applies when the at-fault driver's policy limits are too low to cover the full loss — is available as optional coverage and advisable given the state's minimum limits.
Because Arkansas is a tort state, establishing fault is central to every auto injury claim. The comparative fault rules discussed above apply directly: if an insurer can demonstrate that the injured driver was 50% or more responsible for the crash, the claim is barred entirely. Post-accident conduct, including recorded statements, social media posts, and delay in seeking medical care, can materially affect how fault is allocated under Arkansas law.
Estimate Your Arkansas Settlement Value
Use our free calculator to see what your Arkansas personal injury case may be worth.
Use the Free Calculator →